View
BlueJeans by Verizon — video collaboration platform

BlueJeans
by Verizon

Verizon · Enterprise · Cloud Video · 2020–2023
Digital Product Design Design System Unified Communication Cross-Platform Collaboration Platform Cloud-Based Video Conferencing Desktop App (Windows / macOS) Mobile Application Digital Product Design Design System Unified Communication Cross-Platform Collaboration Platform Cloud-Based Video Conferencing Desktop App (Windows / macOS) Mobile Application
Case Study Overview

Three parallel tracks.
One unified platform.

01 / Remote Learning
Corporate Training
& Remote Learning
01
Corporate Training & Remote Learning

Design Lead for remote learning transformation. Designed the digital classroom experience adopted by Verizon Training, University of Michigan, and Wharton School of Pennsylvania.

Explore section
02 / BlueJeans Meetings
BlueJeans
Meetings
02
BlueJeans Meetings

Preferences redesign drove 12% increase in feature usage and 85% reduction in task completion time. Computer vision POCs and Meta partnership expanded the platform's capabilities.

Explore section
03 / Design System
Blue
Design System
03
Blue Design System

900+ components built with atomic design principles. Set a 29-second page design record. Became the foundation for Verizon's design system migration and cut feature development time by 85%.

Explore section
Section One

Corporate Training
& Remote Learning

How design supported remote learning transformation, digital classroom systems, and human connection at scale, in the middle of a global pandemic.

01 · Context

Building the digital classroom
as the world moved online.

As Design Lead for the Remote Learning product, I helped redefine what a virtual classroom could be when physical classrooms were no longer an option. The challenge was not building another video conferencing product. It was designing an environment capable of supporting the complexity of real learning. Teaching, communication, participation, classroom management, and human connection all needed to coexist within a single experience.

Technology kept people connected during the pandemic. Design determined whether those interactions felt transactional or genuinely human.

02 · Partner Adoption

Adopted across enterprise
and higher education.

Adopted by organizations including Verizon Training, the University of Michigan, and the Wharton School, the platform served educators, students, and enterprise learners during a period when digital communication became a critical part of everyday life. Its success across diverse learning environments demonstrated that the experience could support far more than video conferencing, accommodating the complexity of real classrooms, training programs, and collaborative learning at scale.

Partner Institutions

Universities, schools, and enterprise organizations that adopted the platform.


Wharton School Northwestern University University of Michigan USC Viterbi Khan Academy Northwood University Stevenson University Fuller Seminary BCNet University of Louisville

After experimenting with different solutions, BlueJeans was by far superior to other tools.

Todd Austin
Videoconferencing Lead, College of Literature,
Science & the Arts,
University of Michigan

On a daily basis, BlueJeans affects our culture. It lets us incorporate the world into our classroom. That's the direction we're moving as a global business school.

Dan Alig
CIO
Wharton School & UPenn

If we were to look at another product... I have a hard time believing their customer support could do the things BlueJeans does. To me, that puts BlueJeans above the rest.

Steve Engorn
Former CIO
Stevenson University
03 · User Research & Testing

Research that adapted
to pandemic constraints.

BlueJeans — user testing process

During the pandemic, traditional in-person research became impossible. User testing shifted entirely online through platforms including usabilityhub and usertesting.com.

Through extensive A/B testing, heat map analysis, event tracking, and expert interviews, we continuously refined the product around real classroom behavior rather than assumptions.

Educators across multiple grade levels participated in cognitive walkthroughs, helping validate whether the platform addressed the realities of teaching, engagement, and classroom management in a remote environment.

06 · Key Insights

What the research
actually revealed.

The insights were behavioral, not cosmetic. They changed what we built, not just how we built it.

🧠
Cognitive Load

Instructors managing a live classroom were operating at cognitive capacity. Every extra click was an error waiting to happen. Controls needed to be anticipatory, not reactive.

👁️
Visibility Gap

Students felt invisible in large classes. When they couldn't see themselves or gauge participation, engagement dropped. Presence signals mattered more than we expected.

🔄
Context Switching

Educators lost significant time moving between tools: slides, roster, chat, participant controls. Reducing context switching was the highest-leverage design intervention.

🛡️
Trust in the Platform

Technical failures during live sessions caused disproportionate loss of student trust. Stability and recovery behavior mattered more than any feature.

Onboarding Friction

First-session setup consistently blocked instructors from focusing on teaching. The FTU experience needed to establish confidence, not just configure settings.

🎓
Grade-Level Variance

Classroom needs varied sharply between K-12, higher ed, and enterprise. A one-size UI failed all of them. Configurability wasn't optional, it was the product.

04 · Feature Architecture

Four themes. One coherent system.

Rather than a feature list, the platform was organized around the real jobs an instructor and learner perform simultaneously.

01
Classroom Management
Control without distraction

Instructors needed authority over their classroom without constant micro-management. Attendance, muting, participant visibility, and focus controls had to feel natural, not surgical.

  • Attendance & roster management
  • Smart mute & spotlight controls
  • Breakout room orchestration
  • Hand-raise & queue management
02
Collaboration & Engagement
Presence in a virtual room

Passive video watching is not learning. The platform needed engagement mechanisms that felt organic, not gamified. Reactions, annotations, and live polling closed the loop between instructor and student.

  • Live reactions & emoji responses
  • Shared annotation tools
  • Polling & Q&A systems
  • Chat panel with threading
03
Flexible Learning
Adapts to every classroom dynamic

No two classrooms behave the same. Content types, group sizes, and teaching styles all demand different configurations. The system needed to flex without requiring the instructor to redesign their workflow.

  • Video layout switching
  • Responsive participant grid
  • Expand / collapse classroom panels
  • Multi-device compatibility
04
Smart Communication
The right channel at the right moment

Communication in a classroom is layered: instructor to group, instructor to individual, student to student. The design made each channel accessible without interrupting the primary teaching flow.

  • Contextual direct messaging
  • Broadcast announcements
  • Teaching apps integration
  • Screen share + overlay modes
02 · Remote Learning Dashboard

The virtual classroom
in motion.

The dashboard was the operational center of the classroom: attendance, content, communication, and participant management converging in one environment.

BlueJeans Remote Learning Dashboard on iMac
BlueJeans — group meeting mock
05 · First Time User Experience & Entry Flow

The first three minutes
set everything.

BlueJeans — remote learning entry flow
BlueJeans — enter/exit classroom flow
BlueJeans FTU — responsive first-time use experience
BlueJeans — expand/collapse classroom state management
06 · Video Layout System

Designing for constant
adaptation.

BlueJeans — video layout gallery mock

Designing the virtual classroom meant designing for constant adaptation. Every participant, teaching style, and classroom dynamic demanded flexibility, while technical infrastructure imposed strict limitations on layout behavior and rendering logic.

The challenge wasn't simply arranging windows. It was designing a system capable of balancing teaching, visibility, communication, and engagement simultaneously.

The rendering logic system had to be both intelligent and transparent: making decisions the instructor didn't have to think about, while remaining predictable enough to trust.

Video layout rendering logic — decision system for dynamic layouts
Video layout — people view
Video layout — speaker view
Video layout — gallery view
Dashboard configuration — layout system settings
07 · Screen Share System

Complexity management
under real constraints.

Screen share — rendering logic
08 · Weather Person Mode

Transforming
screen share into
a human experience.

Weather Person Mode — instructor overlay mock

I led the development of "Weather Person Mode," allowing instructors to overlay themselves directly onto presentations without background interruption.

The feature transformed passive screen sharing into a more engaging and human teaching experience. The instructor remained physically present in the content, not replaced by it.

Designing this required close collaboration with engineering to understand the rendering constraints and build a system that felt seamless despite significant technical complexity beneath.

Weather Person Mode — user flow and configuration
Attendee view — receiving a Weather Person Mode share
09 · Panel Architecture

Modular classroom
infrastructure.

Multitasking optimization. Balancing teaching, participant management, and classroom communication simultaneously without overloading the primary teaching surface.

People panel — participant management
Chats panel — classroom communication
App panel design — teaching applications
Section Two

BlueJeans
Meetings

Core platform optimization, usability refinement, desktop experience modernization. From the education ecosystem to the meeting room, the product that most people used, every day.

10 · Preferences Redesign

Restructuring the most
heavily used area.

📈12%
Increase in Feature Usage
85%
Reduction in Task Time
Preference redesign — information architecture
11 · Name Tag

Presence in a
virtual room.

12 · Smart Theme (POC)

Early AI.
Contextual personalization.

Section Three

Blue
Design System

Scalability, operational maturity, system architecture, engineering collaboration. The infrastructure that made every other section of this case study possible.

13 · Atomic Design System

900+ components.
One shared language.

To support a rapidly evolving product ecosystem, I led the creation of an Atomic Design System in Figma, consisting of over 900 responsive components, reusable patterns, and production-ready templates. More than a UI library, the system became a shared language between design and engineering. It brought consistency across products, accelerated decision-making, reduced implementation friction, and created a scalable foundation for future growth. By transforming design from a collection of individual screens into a cohesive system, teams were able to move faster while maintaining a higher standard of quality.

The design system became a force multiplier across the organization.

  • 30% reduction in design time
  • faster prototype creation
  • Significant reduction in engineering iterations
  • faster UI implementation on average, some workflows reaching
  • 70% reduction in UI-related bugs
  • Improved product consistency and delivery efficiency

The result was not simply faster execution, but a more scalable product development process capable of supporting long-term growth.

Explore the system on Figma ↗
30%
Design Time Saved
Faster Prototyping
70%
Fewer UI Bugs
3–7×
Faster Implementation
14 · Outcomes

Systems leadership
at an inflection point.

This wasn't just interface design. It was systems leadership during a moment when digital communication became essential to how people worked, learned, and connected.

900+
Design System Components
85%
Faster Task Completion
70%
Fewer UI Bugs
Prototyping Speed
12%
Feature Usage Increase
30%
Reduction in Design Time
3–7×
Faster UI Implementation
3+
Major Institutions Adopted
Next Case Study

04 / Iconmobile

Designing for context, constraints, and human behavior at automotive scale.

See the case study Back to portfolio